Subaru Impreza, registered in 2005
77.0% pass rate
from 3,839 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(28% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Impreza is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 8.4% fail on Registration plate (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.10% fail on All position lamps
- 0.026% fail on Switch
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fog lamp
- 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Tell tale
- 0.078% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Direction indicators
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.10% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Size / type
- 0.052% fail on Valve stem
-
4.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.83% fail on Windscreen
- 0.81% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Bonnet
- 0.026% fail on Mirrors
-
3.8% fail on
Brakes
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs
- 0.026% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Front wheels
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Rear wheels (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Brake operation
-
0.31% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pipes (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Hoses
- 0.10% fail on Leaks
-
0.21% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.078% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.078% fail on
Pedal
- 0.052% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.026% fail on Condition
-
0.078% fail on
Pedal
-
0.026% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.026% fail on Linkage
-
0.026% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.026% fail on Leaks
- 0.026% fail on ABS
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.68% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
- 0.026% fail on Condition
-
0.31% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Wheel bearings
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rear
- 0.052% fail on Front
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(94% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Condition (96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Location
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension arms
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins / bushes (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Drive shafts
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Constant velocity joints (96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.026% fail on Condition
- 0.026% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.026% fail on Attachment
- 0.078% fail on Front suspension joints (83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.052% fail on Condition
- 0.026% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
0.96% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
2.0% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.078% fail on Requirements
- 0.026% fail on Attachment
- 0.026% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.18% fail on
Body and structure
- 0.052% fail on Body condition
-
0.052% fail on
Doors
- 0.026% fail on Passengers front
- 0.026% fail on Passengers other
- 0.026% fail on Load security (class v)
-
0.026% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.026% fail on Chassis
-
0.026% fail on
Seats
- 0.026% fail on Drivers
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Steering system
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Steering rack
-
0.026% fail on
Steering control
- 0.026% fail on Steering column
- 0.026% fail on Locking devices
-
0.10% fail on
Steering system
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review



