MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Amica » 2002

Hyundai Amica MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.9% pass rate
from 745 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Amica is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 4.2% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's door (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.54% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame condition (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.54% fail on Chassis
      • 0.54% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.13% fail on Bracket
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Cabs
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.81% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.13% fail on Valves
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.13% fail on Servos
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.4% fail on Suspension (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Suspension rod
  • 9.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.40% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages