2002 Hyundai Accent MOT Results

Hyundai Accent, registered in 2002

53.3% pass rate

from 6,839 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(4.4% worse than other 2002 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Hyundai MoT results

Hyundai Accent MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.

27% fail on Lighting and signalling (14% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Registration plate (25% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Position lamps (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 7.8% fail on Front lamps (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.31% fail on Rear lamps
  - 0.073% fail on All position lamps
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.2% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.073% fail on Matched pair
- 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Tell tale
- 0.73% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.73% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.23% fail on Individual lamps (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Horn
- 0.029% fail on Hazard warning (91% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Switch (89% better than other 2002 cars)
21% fail on Brakes (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 13% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Brake operation
- 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 9.8% fail on Components (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 9.7% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
    - 0.10% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.015% fail on Cylinders
    - 0.015% fail on Valves
  - 0.39% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Operation
- 2.4% fail on Hub components
  - 1.9% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.56% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.058% fail on Wheel cylinder
  - 0.044% fail on Brake calipers
  - 0.015% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.015% fail on Brake drums
  - 0.015% fail on Brake back plates
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake
  - 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.60% fail on ABS
- 0.39% fail on Service brake control components (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Pedal (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
    - 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.058% fail on Mechanical components (83% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Cable (85% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.015% fail on Lever
- 0.029% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.015% fail on Components
    - 0.015% fail on Pipes
  - 0.015% fail on Leaks
- 0.015% fail on Additional braking devices
10% fail on Driver's view of the road (14% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Washers (24% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors (70% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Bonnet
10.0% fail on Tyres
- 7.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Size / type
- 0.044% fail on Valve stem
6.8% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (54% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Front drive shafts (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.015% fail on Couplings
- 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Pins / bushes (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Linkage (82% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Pins / bushes (62% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.058% fail on Attachment
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.97% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Rear (48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Front suspension joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas (49% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Component mounting
- 0.044% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.015% fail on Location
- 0.044% fail on Bonded suspension
  - 0.029% fail on Condition
  - 0.015% fail on Attachment
- 0.044% fail on Tie bars / rods (77% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.029% fail on Sub-frames (83% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.015% fail on Condition
  - 0.015% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Fluid suspension
  - 0.015% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.015% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.015% fail on Pins / bushes
5.6% fail on Fuel and exhaust
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.1% fail on Spark ignition (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 3.1% fail on Catalyst (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.20% fail on Hose (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Cap (73% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Tank
  - 0.029% fail on System (90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Compression ignition (91% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Turbo (90% better than other 2002 cars)
3.6% fail on Steering
- 3.0% fail on Steering system (19% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.13% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Power steering
  - 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.088% fail on Other components
  - 0.058% fail on Pump
- 0.15% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Steering control
  - 0.015% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.015% fail on Steering operation
1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
0.86% fail on Seat belts
- 0.58% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Requirements
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
0.75% fail on Body and structure
- 0.44% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Drivers (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Passengers front
  - 0.058% fail on Passengers other
- 0.23% fail on Body condition
- 0.029% fail on Seats
  - 0.029% fail on Drivers
- 0.015% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 0.015% fail on Chassis
- 0.015% fail on Body security
- 0.015% fail on Load security
  - 0.015% fail on Bootlid
0.28% fail on Road wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Condition
0.029% fail on Towbars
- 0.029% fail on Towbar

Read the Honest John Review

Hyundai Accent 2000
It rides well and is reliable. Originally came with a five-year warranty.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John