Honda CR-V, registered in 1997
48.4% pass rate
from 2,484 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(6.9% better than other 1997 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda CR-V is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(13% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins / bushes (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Presence (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Condition
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
(84% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Location
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 6.2% fail on Pins / bushes (26% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Attachment
- 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins / bushes (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(49% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Component mounting (35% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Shock absorbers
(73% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (73% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.40% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
0.28% fail on
Wheel bearings
(89% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Front (72% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Rear
-
0.24% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.24% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.081% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.081% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.081% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
0.040% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.040% fail on Condition
-
9.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
25% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(9.8% better than other 1997 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
(48% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Front lamps (64% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.28% fail on All position lamps
- 0.040% fail on Rear lamps
- 9.5% fail on Registration plate (19% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.081% fail on Tell tale
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Matched pair
-
0.40% fail on
Direction indicators
(89% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Switch
-
0.40% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Horn (72% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.040% fail on Switch
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
(48% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 1997 cars)
- 6.4% fail on ABS (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(58% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Components
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pipes (37% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Hoses (96% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.28% fail on Leaks
- 0.12% fail on Operation
-
3.6% fail on
Components
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs
- 0.040% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.040% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(85% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Front wheels (80% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear wheels (98% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake
(79% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Condition (79% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Restricted movement
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(17% better than other 1997 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers (39% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Windscreen
- 0.32% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
10% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(26% better than other 1997 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.2% fail on Catalyst
- 0.040% fail on Pre 01 / 08 / 1975 visual
- 5.2% fail on Exhaust system (28% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.76% fail on Cap
- 0.040% fail on Tank
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
(35% better than other 1997 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (44% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size / type (78% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Valve stem
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.4% fail on
Steering system
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.93% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Free play
- 0.32% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Drag link end
-
0.28% fail on
Power steering
- 0.16% fail on Other components
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.040% fail on Operation
- 0.081% fail on Locking devices
-
5.4% fail on
Steering system
-
2.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate
-
1.6% fail on
Body and structure
(65% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Body condition (63% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
- 0.32% fail on Passengers front
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.12% fail on Passengers other
-
0.20% fail on
Vehicle structure
(86% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Chassis (86% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Load security
- 0.040% fail on Tailgate
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(77% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Requirements
-
0.60% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.60% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Towbars
- 0.040% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda CR-V 1997
Road-friendly 4x4 with a strong track record of reliability.
