2000 Audi A4 MOT Results

Audi A4, registered in 2000

48.1% pass rate

from 13,519 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Audi MoT results

Audi A4 MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Request a Audi A4 brochure

Request a Audi A4 test drive

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi A4 is unusually good or bad.

31% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 17% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 17% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 17% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Couplings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 9.1% fail on Pins / bushes (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.081% fail on Condition
  - 0.022% fail on Attachment (73% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Coil springs (18% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Condition (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.022% fail on Location (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Rear (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Front (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Linkage (44% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.30% fail on Pins / bushes (56% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.081% fail on Attachment (54% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.78% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Tie bars / rods
  - 0.24% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.0074% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on Sub-frames (64% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Pins / bushes (75% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.030% fail on Condition
  - 0.030% fail on Attachment
- 0.089% fail on Trailing arms (79% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.089% fail on Pins / bushes (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Radius arms (59% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.059% fail on Pins / bushes (61% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Condition
- 0.030% fail on Torque / reaction arms
  - 0.030% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas (99% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.015% fail on Component mounting (99% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Spring mounting
  - 0.0074% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.022% fail on Fluid suspension
  - 0.022% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.0074% fail on General condition
- 0.0074% fail on Panhard rods
  - 0.0074% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.0074% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.0074% fail on Condition
- 0.0074% fail on Axles
  - 0.0074% fail on Swivel joints / housing
- 0.0074% fail on Front suspension locking devices
19% fail on Lighting and signalling (27% better than other 2000 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Position lamps (28% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Front lamps (23% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on All position lamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamps (17% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Headlamp (17% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.052% fail on Switch
  - 0.030% fail on Matched pair
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate (62% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.00% fail on Individual lamps (22% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.85% fail on Direction indicators
    - 0.067% fail on Switch
    - 0.0074% fail on Tell tales
- 0.76% fail on Fog lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.73% fail on Fog lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Tell tale
  - 0.030% fail on Switch
- 0.32% fail on Hazard warning (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Switch
  - 0.14% fail on Lamp (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
15% fail on Brakes (16% better than other 2000 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 7.6% fail on Components
    - 7.3% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.29% fail on Pipes (94% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.037% fail on Reservoirs (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.015% fail on Valves (99% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.0074% fail on Servos
    - 0.0074% fail on Pump
  - 0.30% fail on Leaks
  - 0.037% fail on Operation
- 4.5% fail on Brake performance (51% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Front wheels
  - 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (63% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.081% fail on Brake operation
- 3.7% fail on Hub components (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.5% fail on Brake discs (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Brake calipers (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.030% fail on Brake linings
- 1.3% fail on ABS (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake (86% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.081% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.067% fail on Components
    - 0.037% fail on Hoses (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.030% fail on Servos
  - 0.0074% fail on Operation
  - 0.0074% fail on Leaks
- 0.052% fail on Mechanical components (88% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Cable (90% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.015% fail on Linkage
- 0.022% fail on Additional braking devices
- 0.0074% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.0074% fail on Pedal
    - 0.0074% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.0074% fail on Locking devices
9.6% fail on Tyres (12% better than other 2000 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Tread depth (9.9% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (12% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Size / type (50% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Valve stem
9.1% fail on Steering (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Steering system (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Ball joint (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.044% fail on Free play (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.044% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.037% fail on Steering arm (68% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.0074% fail on Lock stop
- 0.12% fail on Power steering (78% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.052% fail on Pipes and hoses (71% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Other components (75% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Operation
  - 0.0074% fail on Pump
  - 0.0074% fail on Rams
- 0.052% fail on Locking devices
- 0.030% fail on Steering operation (69% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Steering control
  - 0.0074% fail on Steering coupling
    - 0.0074% fail on Universal joint
7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (19% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Windscreen (23% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers (70% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors (68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Bonnet (70% better than other 2000 cars)
7.0% fail on Fuel and exhaust (36% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Spark ignition (13% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Catalyst (13% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Non catalyst
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Fuel system (28% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.31% fail on System
  - 0.20% fail on Cap
  - 0.067% fail on Pipe
  - 0.030% fail on Hose
- 0.39% fail on Compression ignition
  - 0.39% fail on Turbo
2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
0.45% fail on Body and structure (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Body condition (71% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Doors (72% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.044% fail on Drivers (69% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.037% fail on Passengers front (76% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.0074% fail on Passengers other
- 0.030% fail on Body security
- 0.030% fail on Seats (86% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.030% fail on Drivers (86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Load security
  - 0.022% fail on Bootlid
- 0.0074% fail on Load security (class v)
- 0.0074% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 0.0074% fail on Chassis
0.28% fail on Seat belts (90% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Requirements
- 0.0074% fail on Attachment
- 0.0074% fail on Prescribed areas
0.24% fail on Road wheels (60% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Halfshafts
0.015% fail on Towbars
- 0.0074% fail on Towbar
- 0.0074% fail on Vehicle structure

Read the Honest John Review

Audi A4 1995
Stylish looker with strong engines, mostly good build quality and tidy handling.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John