Toyota Carina E, registered in 1992
50.3% pass rate
from 1,084 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Carina E is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 8.9% fail on Registration plate (57% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.28% fail on All position lamps
- 0.092% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.092% fail on Matched pair
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.18% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.092% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Fog lamp
(61% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (61% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Switch
-
0.37% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.37% fail on Switch
- 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.092% fail on Horn
-
21% fail on
Suspension
-
9.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage
- 0.83% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
-
1.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Front
- 0.092% fail on Rear
-
1.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(80% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting (77% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting (87% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension arms
(68% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Pins / bushes (70% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Attachment
-
0.37% fail on
Coil springs
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition (74% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Front suspension joints (78% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.092% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.092% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.092% fail on Pins / bushes
-
9.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.7% fail on Front wheels
- 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.092% fail on Brake operation
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.6% fail on
Components
- 5.0% fail on Pipes
- 2.6% fail on Hoses
- 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.092% fail on Leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Components
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Hub components
(52% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Brake pads
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs
- 0.092% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.28% fail on ABS
-
0.092% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.092% fail on
Pedal
- 0.092% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.092% fail on
Pedal
-
0.092% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.092% fail on Cable
-
0.092% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.092% fail on
Components
- 0.092% fail on Pipes
-
0.092% fail on
Components
- 0.092% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(83% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Catalyst (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Non catalyst (68% better than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (32% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
(82% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.18% fail on System
- 0.092% fail on Cap
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(83% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 8.6% fail on Tread depth (49% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.092% fail on Size / type
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
1.7% fail on
Body and structure
(70% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Body condition (56% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Vehicle structure
(79% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 1992 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(82% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(88% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack (90% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Pump
- 0.18% fail on Other components
- 0.092% fail on Steering operation
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(88% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
(88% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.092% fail on Attachment
