Peugeot 806, registered in 2002
52.6% pass rate
from 686 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 806 is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(22% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Registration plate (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.44% fail on All position lamps
- 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
4.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(78% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(72% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.44% fail on Direction indicators
-
0.15% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.15% fail on Tell tales
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(72% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Fog lamp
- 0.73% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Horn
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(47% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Windscreen
- 1.6% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.8% fail on Catalyst
- 0.15% fail on Non catalyst
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Turbo (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.15% fail on System
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 8.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Size / type
- 0.29% fail on Valve stem (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Brakes
(26% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
2.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.2% fail on
Components
- 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.73% fail on Pipes (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.15% fail on Leaks
-
2.2% fail on
Components
- 1.2% fail on ABS
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.44% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
-
0.15% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.15% fail on Cable
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.8% fail on Pins / bushes
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
(61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins / bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.29% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Front
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
3.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.58% fail on Steering rack
- 0.44% fail on Steering arm
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.15% fail on
Free play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
0.87% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.15% fail on Operation
- 0.15% fail on Drive system
- 0.15% fail on Pump
- 0.15% fail on Other components
-
4.1% fail on
Steering system
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.73% fail on Requirements (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
-
1.0% fail on
Body and structure
- 0.44% fail on Body condition
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
- 0.15% fail on Drivers
- 0.15% fail on Passengers front
-
0.15% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.15% fail on Chassis
- 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.15% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 806 1995
Economical 110bhp HDi. Handy sliding rear doors and a well-designed, airy cabin.
