1996 Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Peugeot 106, registered in 1996

39.3% pass rate

from 14,126 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(9.0% worse than other 1996 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Peugeot MoT results

Peugeot 106 MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

32% fail on Lighting and signalling (15% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Registration plate (30% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (9.3% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (35% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Position lamps (11% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 6.5% fail on Front lamps (16% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.86% fail on Rear lamps
  - 0.18% fail on All position lamps
  - 0.0071% fail on Switch
- 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (42% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 4.8% fail on Flashing type (42% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
    - 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
    - 0.20% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.035% fail on Tell tales
  - 0.0071% fail on Semaphore
    - 0.0071% fail on Switch
- 4.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.5% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.050% fail on Matched pair
  - 0.0071% fail on Switch
  - 0.0071% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (28% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Fog lamp (33% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Tell tale
  - 0.099% fail on Switch
- 1.1% fail on Horn (27% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Hazard warning (48% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Switch
  - 0.035% fail on Lamp
  - 0.014% fail on Tell tale (79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors
27% fail on Brakes (20% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 20% fail on Brake performance (64% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 10% fail on Rear wheels (63% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 10% fail on Parking brake performance (61% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 6.4% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.057% fail on Brake operation
- 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (42% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Components (46% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 3.7% fail on Pipes (38% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Hoses (59% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.23% fail on Reservoirs
    - 0.021% fail on Valves (98% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.014% fail on Servos
  - 0.64% fail on Leaks (74% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Operation
- 5.3% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.0071% fail on Fitment
- 3.1% fail on Hub components
  - 1.4% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Brake discs (81% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Wheel cylinder (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
  - 0.050% fail on Brake drums
  - 0.014% fail on Brake linings
- 1.3% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 1.1% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Mechanical components (32% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Cable (45% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.078% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.0071% fail on Linkage
  - 0.0071% fail on Stationary pin
- 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
  - 0.0071% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting
- 0.042% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.042% fail on Components
    - 0.035% fail on Servos
    - 0.0071% fail on Pipes
- 0.035% fail on Locking devices
- 0.014% fail on Additional braking devices
27% fail on Suspension (7.8% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 13% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 13% fail on Front drive shafts (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.042% fail on Couplings
    - 0.0071% fail on Drive shafts
- 6.6% fail on Suspension arms (28% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 6.4% fail on Pins / bushes (31% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Attachment
  - 0.028% fail on Condition (81% better than other 1996 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 5.3% fail on Component mounting
  - 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
  - 0.21% fail on Spring mounting (58% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (16% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Front (52% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Rear (46% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints (21% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (60% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.00% fail on Condition (61% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.0071% fail on Fitment
- 0.98% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.95% fail on Pins / bushes (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.028% fail on Condition
  - 0.0071% fail on Attachment
- 0.62% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.46% fail on Attachment (89% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.092% fail on Pins / bushes (88% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.050% fail on Linkage (98% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.028% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Axle beam (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Swivel joints / housing (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Stub axle (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Clearance
- 0.41% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.40% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.014% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Condition (87% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.057% fail on Location (60% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut (68% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Condition (68% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Torsion bars (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.071% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Torque / reaction arms
  - 0.057% fail on Pins / bushes (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frames (84% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Pins / bushes (79% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Attachment
- 0.042% fail on Bonded suspension
  - 0.042% fail on Condition
- 0.021% fail on General condition
- 0.021% fail on Front suspension locking devices
- 0.014% fail on Fluid suspension (86% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Operation
- 0.014% fail on Tie bars / rods (94% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Pins / bushes (93% better than other 1996 cars)
22% fail on Fuel and exhaust (58% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 14% fail on Spark ignition (97% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 14% fail on Catalyst (98% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Non catalyst
- 9.5% fail on Exhaust system (25% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Fuel system (75% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Pipe
  - 0.057% fail on Cap (88% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.050% fail on Tank (68% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.028% fail on Hose
- 0.45% fail on Compression ignition (29% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Non turbo (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Turbo (91% better than other 1996 cars)
15% fail on Driver's view of the road (19% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Wipers (8.9% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Washers (37% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 0.96% fail on Mirrors
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet (70% worse than other 1996 cars)
12% fail on Tyres (7.4% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Tread depth
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.59% fail on Size / type
- 0.15% fail on Valve stem (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
7.1% fail on Body and structure (31% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 3.1% fail on Drivers (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Doors (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.78% fail on Drivers (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Passengers front (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Passengers other (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Body condition (54% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Vehicle structure (42% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.98% fail on Chassis (42% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Body security
- 0.014% fail on Load security
  - 0.0071% fail on Bootlid
  - 0.0071% fail on Tailgate
- 0.0071% fail on Load security (class v)
2.4% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Condition
- 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Requirements
1.3% fail on Steering (77% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Steering system (83% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.31% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.27% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.050% fail on Free play (79% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.050% fail on Steering rack (76% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.0071% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.0071% fail on Steering arm
- 0.24% fail on Steering control
  - 0.17% fail on Steering column
  - 0.064% fail on Steering wheel (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.0071% fail on Steering coupling
    - 0.0071% fail on Universal joint
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Steering operation
- 0.050% fail on Power steering (91% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Operation
  - 0.0071% fail on Other components
- 0.021% fail on Locking devices (76% better than other 1996 cars)
1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN (39% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate (40% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.0071% fail on Vehicle identification number
0.24% fail on Road wheels (57% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (44% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 1996 cars)
0.042% fail on Towbars (79% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Towbar
- 0.021% fail on Vehicle structure (87% better than other 1996 cars)

Read the Honest John Review

Peugeot 106 1991
Tidy drive with very good handling. Inexpensive to buy and run.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John