Peugeot 1007, registered in 2006
70.4% pass rate
from 3,378 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(14% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 1007 is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Windscreen
- 0.15% fail on Mirrors
-
10% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(33% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (35% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.18% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.089% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Tell tale
- 0.21% fail on Horn
-
7.8% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size / type
- 0.030% fail on Valve stem
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
- 0.059% fail on Steering rack
- 0.059% fail on Drag link end
-
0.030% fail on
Free play
- 0.030% fail on Steering rack
- 0.030% fail on Steering arm
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Drive system
-
0.030% fail on
Steering control
- 0.030% fail on Steering column
-
6.0% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension
(27% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.92% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.62% fail on
Coil springs
(56% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Location
-
0.56% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.36% fail on Linkage
- 0.21% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.50% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Front (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear
- 0.50% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.36% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.030% fail on General condition
-
0.030% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.030% fail on Spring eye
-
0.030% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.030% fail on Pins / bushes
-
0.030% fail on
Axles
- 0.030% fail on Clearance
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension arms
-
2.7% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Front wheels
- 0.65% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.89% fail on
Hub components
(55% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake discs
- 0.059% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.030% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.24% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.21% fail on
Components
- 0.12% fail on Hoses
- 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.030% fail on Pipes
- 0.059% fail on Leaks
-
0.21% fail on
Components
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on ABS
- 0.089% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.030% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.030% fail on Leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
- 0.77% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.33% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on System
- 0.059% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Cap
- 0.030% fail on Pipe
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.12% fail on Turbo
- 0.030% fail on Non turbo
-
0.089% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.089% fail on Catalyst
-
0.30% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.30% fail on Registration plate
-
0.27% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Body and structure
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
- 0.059% fail on Drivers
- 0.059% fail on Passengers front
- 0.030% fail on Passengers other
-
0.030% fail on
Load security
- 0.030% fail on Loading door
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.030% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.030% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
.jpg)
Peugeot 1007 2005
Citroen C2 based, Verlizy designed city car with good safety credentials and a high spec. Easy front seat access to its tall cabin.
