Nissan Terrano, registered in 2002
53.4% pass rate
from 1,809 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(79% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 14% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pins / bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
14% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 14% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.055% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.055% fail on Universal joint
-
14% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(95% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Rear
-
0.94% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.94% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.44% fail on Pins / bushes (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Front suspension joints (61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Suspension arms
(89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins / bushes (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting
- 0.055% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.17% fail on General condition (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.055% fail on Condition
- 0.055% fail on Attachment
-
0.055% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
0.055% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.44% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.83% fail on Direction indicators
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate (70% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fog lamp
(75% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
0.22% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.22% fail on Switch
- 0.055% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.8% fail on
Position lamps
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(36% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Components
(200% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Hoses
- 0.17% fail on Valves
- 0.33% fail on Leaks
- 0.055% fail on Operation
-
12% fail on
Components
(200% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Brake operation
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Brake drums
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.61% fail on ABS
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.055% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(98% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Turbo (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Pipe (27 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.77% fail on System (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Cap
-
0.055% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.055% fail on Catalyst
-
7.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
- 0.83% fail on Windscreen
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
(34% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.88% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Size / type
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Steering system
(57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Drag link end
-
0.11% fail on
Free play
- 0.11% fail on Steering box (56 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Steering arm
-
0.55% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.22% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.055% fail on Drive system
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
- 0.055% fail on Steering operation
-
1.6% fail on
Steering system
(57% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.77% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.72% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Requirements
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.72% fail on
Body and structure
-
0.28% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.28% fail on Chassis
- 0.22% fail on Body condition
- 0.11% fail on Body security
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
- 0.055% fail on Drivers
- 0.055% fail on Passengers front
-
0.28% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
0.33% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
-
0.055% fail on
Towbars
- 0.055% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
.jpg)
Nissan Terrano II 1993
Robust old-school 4x4. Capable off road. Long-wheelbase models seat seven.
