Mitsubishi Lancer, registered in 2000
49.8% pass rate
from 572 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lighting and signalling
-
9.4% fail on
Position lamps
(46% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Front lamps (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate
-
2.8% fail on
Fog lamp
- 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Tell tale
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(69% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Direction indicators
(89% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Horn
-
9.4% fail on
Position lamps
(46% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(93% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Components
(99% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Pipes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Leaks
-
15% fail on
Components
(99% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Front wheels
- 1.0% fail on Rear wheels (76% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Brake operation
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.70% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Brake back plates
-
0.70% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.70% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.35% fail on Cable
- 0.17% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(93% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Steering arm (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack
-
0.87% fail on
Free play
(6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint
-
0.52% fail on
Other components
(12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Steering pivot point (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Drag link end
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
- 0.87% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Operation
-
15% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
- 9.1% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.3% fail on Catalyst
-
0.87% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.70% fail on Cap
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.3% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers (64% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Windscreen
- 0.52% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(48% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.0% fail on Linkage
- 1.4% fail on Pins / bushes
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Front (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Rear
-
1.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Pins / bushes (83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.70% fail on Condition
-
0.52% fail on
Drive shafts
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Front drive shafts
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Constant velocity joints (90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Front drive shafts
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Location
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
9.4% fail on
Tyres
- 7.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Size / type
-
2.6% fail on
Body and structure
-
0.87% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.87% fail on Chassis
- 0.70% fail on Body condition
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
- 0.17% fail on Drivers
- 0.17% fail on Passengers front
- 0.17% fail on Passengers other
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
- 0.17% fail on Body security
-
0.87% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
2.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.35% fail on Requirements
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.87% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.70% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Lancer Estate 2000
A lot of space and kit for the money. Bargain new car prices. Cheap used.
