MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » FTO » 2004

Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results

Registered in 2004
53.7% pass rate
from 54 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 28% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 26% fail on Rbt (sp) (22 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 19% fail on Service brake performance (47 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 13% fail on Service brake imbalance (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.9% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.9% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 20% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 20% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 20% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 17% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.9% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.9% fail on Other leaks
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.6% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 9.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 7.4% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
  • 5.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages