1995 Jeep Cherokee MOT Results

Jeep Cherokee, registered in 1995

54.2% pass rate

from 1,497 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(16% better than other 1995 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All Jeep MoT results

Jeep Cherokee MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

23% fail on Lighting and signalling (16% better than other 1995 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.3% fail on Position lamps
  - 4.5% fail on Front lamps
  - 0.47% fail on Rear lamps
  - 0.27% fail on All position lamps
  - 0.067% fail on Switch
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate (50% better than other 1995 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamps (34% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Switch
  - 0.067% fail on Matched pair
  - 0.067% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (54% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Flashing type (54% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.73% fail on Direction indicators
    - 0.73% fail on Individual lamps (53% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.33% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Tell tales
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (43% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.67% fail on Horn
- 0.067% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.067% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.067% fail on Tell tale
18% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 1995 cars)
- 11% fail on Prescribed areas (44% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 6.7% fail on Spring mounting (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Component mounting
  - 0.067% fail on Subframe mounting
- 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
  - 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts (32% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 2.3% fail on Couplings (58 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (54 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.80% fail on Universal joint (56 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (21 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Condition (35 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Shackle
    - 0.067% fail on Anchor
  - 0.20% fail on Shackle bracket (51 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Spring saddle (89 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.067% fail on Spring slippers
  - 0.067% fail on Anchor bracket
  - 0.067% fail on Securing bolts
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.87% fail on Linkage (60% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.33% fail on Attachment
  - 0.067% fail on Condition
- 0.80% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Pins / bushes (86% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Front
  - 0.067% fail on Rear
- 0.47% fail on Panhard rods (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.47% fail on Pins / bushes (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.20% fail on Location
  - 0.067% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Axles
  - 0.20% fail on Swivel joints / housing
  - 0.067% fail on Clearance
- 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.13% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Tie bars / rods
  - 0.13% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.067% fail on Front suspension locking devices
18% fail on Brakes (14% better than other 1995 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.3% fail on Rear wheels
  - 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (38% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Front wheels
  - 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.27% fail on Brake operation
- 7.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (22% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 6.8% fail on Components (25% better than other 1995 cars)
    - 6.2% fail on Pipes
    - 0.47% fail on Reservoirs
    - 0.40% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Leaks
  - 0.27% fail on Operation
- 3.2% fail on Hub components
  - 2.3% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.47% fail on Brake drums (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.20% fail on Wheel cylinder
  - 0.067% fail on Brake linings
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake
  - 1.8% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on ABS
- 0.53% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.53% fail on Pedal
    - 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
    - 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.53% fail on Mechanical components
  - 0.40% fail on Cable
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.067% fail on Pivot
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.20% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
  - 0.067% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.067% fail on Locking devices
13% fail on Fuel and exhaust
- 8.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.9% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Catalyst (59% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.067% fail on Non catalyst
- 1.9% fail on Fuel system
  - 1.1% fail on System (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Cap
  - 0.20% fail on Tank
  - 0.13% fail on Pipe
  - 0.067% fail on Hose
- 0.67% fail on Compression ignition
  - 0.67% fail on Turbo
9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (21% better than other 1995 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers (44% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
7.1% fail on Seat belts
- 6.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Requirements
5.6% fail on Tyres (48% better than other 1995 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (67% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size / type
3.9% fail on Body and structure (31% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
- 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 1.1% fail on Chassis
- 0.20% fail on Doors
  - 0.13% fail on Passengers front
  - 0.067% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Seats
  - 0.20% fail on Drivers
- 0.067% fail on Body security
3.7% fail on Steering (38% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Steering system (48% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.94% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Steering damper (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Free play
    - 0.33% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.27% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Power steering (98% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Other components
  - 0.20% fail on Operation
  - 0.067% fail on Pump
- 0.20% fail on Steering operation
1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate
0.47% fail on Road wheels
- 0.47% fail on Attachment
0.13% fail on Towbars
- 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure

Read the Honest John Review

Jeep Cherokee 1993
The sound of its 4.0-litre straight six. Well equipped for the time.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John