Ford Maverick, registered in 1997
43.9% pass rate
from 1,669 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Maverick is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(17% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 16% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Pins / bushes (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Presence
-
4.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
(72% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
(100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(34% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Component mounting (32% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.30% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins / bushes (76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment
-
0.96% fail on
Tie bars / rods
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Pins / bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Front suspension joints (76% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (95% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Location
- 0.12% fail on General condition
-
0.12% fail on
Torsion bars
(8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Axles
- 0.12% fail on Clearance (29 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
26% fail on
Brakes
(19% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(28% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Parking brake performance (30% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.2% fail on Front wheels (69% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.30% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 11% fail on Pipes (92% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Hoses
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.060% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.1% fail on Leaks (200% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Operation
-
14% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake drums
- 0.12% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.060% fail on Brake back plates
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake
(54% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Condition (53% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.48% fail on
Pedal
- 0.48% fail on Condition
-
0.48% fail on
Pedal
-
0.42% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Master cylinder / servo mounting (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.24% fail on ABS (76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.060% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.060% fail on Linkage
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(28% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
23% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(20% better than other 1997 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
(36% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Front lamps (38% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.18% fail on All position lamps
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.060% fail on Tell tales
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
(33% better than other 1997 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.36% fail on Tell tale
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate (81% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Horn
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.12% fail on Lamp
- 0.12% fail on Switch
- 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
-
15% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Fuel system
(84% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Cap
- 0.24% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Hose
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Turbo (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Non turbo
-
1.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Catalyst (79% better than other 1997 cars)
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.2% fail on Washers
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
- 0.060% fail on Bonnet
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(95% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 11% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment
-
11% fail on
Body and structure
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Body security (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
(81% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
(40% better than other 1997 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (72% better than other 1997 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.84% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
- 0.30% fail on Steering arm
-
0.12% fail on
Free play
- 0.12% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Other components
- 0.12% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.060% fail on Steering box
- 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Other components
- 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
1.3% fail on
Road wheels
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Towbars
- 0.18% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Swivelling towbar
- 0.060% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Maverick 1993
Decent off-road ability. Long-wheelbase version seats seven.
