Ford Galaxy, registered in 2000
44.8% pass rate
from 8,088 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
(7.5% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Galaxy is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lighting and signalling
(19% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (64% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Position lamps
(45% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Front lamps (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.23% fail on All position lamps
- 8.1% fail on Registration plate (10% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Tell tales
- 0.037% fail on Switch
-
7.5% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (14% better than other 2000 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
(32% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp (32% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Switch
- 0.025% fail on Matched pair
-
2.7% fail on
Fog lamp
(81% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Fog lamp (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Tell tale
- 0.012% fail on Switch
- 0.25% fail on Horn (55% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.049% fail on Lamp
- 0.049% fail on Switch
- 0.049% fail on Tell tale
- 0.037% fail on Rear reflectors
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(10% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Location (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Linkage (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins / bushes (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Presence
-
3.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Couplings
-
2.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Component mounting (24% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins / bushes (63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.91% fail on
Shock absorbers
(43% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Front suspension joints (49% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Tie bars / rods
- 0.33% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.012% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Wheel bearings
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Front (68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Rear (91% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Trailing arms
(91% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Pins / bushes (91% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.025% fail on
Sub-frames
(91% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Front suspension locking devices
-
0.012% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.012% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.012% fail on
Torque / reaction arms
- 0.012% fail on Pins / bushes
-
8.4% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(10% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Components
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Pipes (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Hoses (57% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Servos (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.20% fail on Leaks
- 0.087% fail on Operation
-
9.3% fail on
Components
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Rear wheels (17% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels (55% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Brake operation
- 4.3% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Hub components
(25% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (28% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs
- 0.27% fail on Brake calipers (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Brake back plates (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Mechanical components
(91% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Cable (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Lever
- 0.025% fail on Linkage
- 0.025% fail on Pivot
- 0.012% fail on Clevis joint
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake
(71% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Fitment
- 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.025% fail on Anti-slip (81% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
-
0.12% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Components
- 0.037% fail on Servos
- 0.025% fail on Pipes
- 0.037% fail on Leaks (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pressure / vacuum build up (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Components
- 0.074% fail on Additional braking devices (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 11% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Steering rack
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Steering arm
-
0.17% fail on
Free play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.049% fail on Drag link end
-
0.012% fail on
Other components
- 0.012% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.17% fail on
Power steering
(68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Operation
- 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Other components (79% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Drive system
- 0.012% fail on Pump
- 0.12% fail on Steering operation
-
0.062% fail on
Steering control
- 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.025% fail on Steering column
-
0.012% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.012% fail on Universal joint
- 0.012% fail on Locking devices
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(11% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst (53% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Compression ignition
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Turbo (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.30% fail on Cap
- 0.23% fail on System (46% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Pipe
- 0.037% fail on Hose
- 0.012% fail on Tank
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 7.0% fail on Tread depth
- 5.0% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Size / type
- 0.049% fail on Valve stem
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (18% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 1.2% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Bonnet
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
(27% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Condition
- 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate
-
1.5% fail on
Body and structure
(24% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Body condition
-
0.45% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.45% fail on Chassis
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Passengers front
- 0.049% fail on Drivers
- 0.025% fail on Passengers other
- 0.087% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.049% fail on Body security
-
0.049% fail on
Seats
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Drivers (77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Load security (class v)
-
0.012% fail on
Load security
- 0.012% fail on Tailgate
-
0.40% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
- 0.074% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Towbars
- 0.049% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Ford Galaxy 1995
True seven-seater that offers an enjoyable, car-like drive.
