2005 FIAT Multipla MOT Results

FIAT Multipla, registered in 2005

49.3% pass rate

from 1,385 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(58% worse than other 2005 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All FIAT MoT results

FIAT Multipla MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

25% fail on Suspension (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Suspension arms (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 10.0% fail on Pins / bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.29% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.9% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.072% fail on Location
- 5.1% fail on Shock absorbers (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.36% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Radius arms (58 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Pins / bushes (59 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.072% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (55% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Trailing arms (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.94% fail on Pins / bushes (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.29% fail on Rear
  - 0.14% fail on Front
- 0.29% fail on Tie bars / rods (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.072% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Bonded suspension (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.072% fail on Spring mounting
  - 0.072% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.072% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.072% fail on Condition
- 0.072% fail on Axles
  - 0.072% fail on Stub axle
18% fail on Lighting and signalling (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Headlamps (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Headlamp (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Matched pair (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Registration plate
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.1% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
    - 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
    - 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Position lamps (58% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Front lamps (67% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.29% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.29% fail on Horn
- 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
  - 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.072% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.072% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.072% fail on Lamp
15% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Front wheels
  - 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.14% fail on Brake operation
- 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Hoses (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.22% fail on Pipes
    - 0.072% fail on Cylinders
    - 0.072% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.29% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Hub components
  - 1.0% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.14% fail on Wheel cylinder (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Restricted movement (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on ABS
- 0.072% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.072% fail on Pedal
    - 0.072% fail on Condition
- 0.072% fail on Locking devices
15% fail on Tyres (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Tread depth (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Valve stem (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Size / type
9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
- 0.36% fail on Mirrors
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
4.2% fail on Steering (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Steering system
  - 3.0% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.43% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.072% fail on Steering arm
- 0.65% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.36% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.072% fail on Rams
- 0.072% fail on Steering control
  - 0.072% fail on Steering shaft
3.8% fail on Fuel and exhaust (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Turbo (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.51% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.36% fail on System
  - 0.14% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Spark ignition
  - 0.29% fail on Catalyst
0.79% fail on Seat belts
- 0.72% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Attachment
0.72% fail on Body and structure (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Body condition
- 0.14% fail on Doors
  - 0.14% fail on Drivers
- 0.072% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 0.072% fail on Chassis
- 0.072% fail on Seats
  - 0.072% fail on Drivers
- 0.072% fail on Load security
  - 0.072% fail on Tailgate
0.22% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 0.22% fail on Registration plate
0.14% fail on Road wheels
- 0.14% fail on Condition

Read the Honest John Review

FIAT Multipla 2004
Better quality than original, rides well, strong MultiJet diesel engines.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John