2002 FIAT Multipla MOT Results

FIAT Multipla, registered in 2002

37.6% pass rate

from 2,186 tests between October 2010 and September 2011

(40% worse than other 2002 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

The MoT Files: MoT Data FAQs

All FIAT MoT results

FIAT Multipla MoT results

Test results by year of registration

How cars perform in their first MoT

The Top 50 models

The full story behind the data

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

34% fail on Lighting and signalling (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 12% fail on Registration plate (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 8.0% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Position lamps
  - 6.1% fail on Front lamps
  - 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
  - 0.27% fail on All position lamps
- 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.82% fail on Individual lamps
    - 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.046% fail on Switch
- 0.91% fail on Fog lamp
  - 0.91% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.37% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.27% fail on Switch
  - 0.14% fail on Lamp
- 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
31% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 12% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 11% fail on Pins / bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.32% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Condition
- 9.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 7.4% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Pins / bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.32% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Shock absorbers (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 5.9% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Coil springs
  - 3.6% fail on Condition
  - 0.14% fail on Location
- 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 3.5% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Front
- 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (38% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Front drive shafts (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (38% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Radius arms (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Pins / bushes (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.50% fail on Condition
- 0.46% fail on Sub-frames (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Pins / bushes
  - 0.091% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.091% fail on Attachment
- 0.27% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.27% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.14% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.18% fail on Bonded suspension
  - 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Fluid suspension
  - 0.14% fail on Suspension unit (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Tie bars / rods
  - 0.091% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.046% fail on General condition
- 0.046% fail on Axles
  - 0.046% fail on Swivel joints / housing
26% fail on Brakes (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 18% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 11% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Front wheels
  - 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.046% fail on Brake operation
- 5.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 4.9% fail on Components
    - 4.0% fail on Hoses (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.91% fail on Pipes (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.046% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.18% fail on Leaks
- 4.1% fail on Hub components (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.046% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.046% fail on Linkage
  - 0.046% fail on Lever
- 0.78% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.55% fail on ABS
- 0.23% fail on Additional braking devices (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.23% fail on Pedal
    - 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
    - 0.046% fail on Condition
- 0.046% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.046% fail on Park brake mechanism / associated mountings
16% fail on Driver's view of the road (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Wipers (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Windscreen
- 0.50% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Mirrors
15% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Tread depth (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Size / type
- 0.091% fail on Valve stem
12% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Steering system (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 10% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.14% fail on Free play
    - 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.046% fail on Drag link end
- 0.55% fail on Power steering
  - 0.23% fail on Other components
  - 0.14% fail on Rams (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.091% fail on Operation
  - 0.046% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.046% fail on Pump
7.6% fail on Fuel and exhaust (31% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Turbo (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.046% fail on Non turbo
- 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
  - 1.8% fail on Catalyst
- 0.69% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.46% fail on System
  - 0.23% fail on Cap
1.6% fail on Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Requirements
1.4% fail on Body and structure (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Passengers other (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Drivers
- 0.41% fail on Body condition
- 0.32% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Body security
1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
0.37% fail on Road wheels
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.046% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

FIAT Multipla 2000
Brilliant, eccentric and superbly practical six-seater.

Honest John's Newsletter

Recently Recommended

Most Recommended Garages

Connect with Honest John