Chevrolet Matiz, registered in 2006
73.1% pass rate
from 5,107 tests between October 2010 and September 2011
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lighting and signalling
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate
-
1.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.35% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.020% fail on All position lamps
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Fog lamp
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Fog lamp (81% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Tell tale
-
0.22% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
(29% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Tread depth (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Size / type
- 0.039% fail on Valve stem
-
5.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.51% fail on Windscreen
- 0.059% fail on Mirrors
- 0.020% fail on Bonnet
-
4.7% fail on
Brakes
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Front wheels
- 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.098% fail on Brake discs (66% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Brake linings
- 0.039% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.039% fail on Wheel cylinder (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.16% fail on
Components
- 0.12% fail on Hoses
- 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.020% fail on Pump
- 0.078% fail on Leaks
- 0.020% fail on Operation
-
0.16% fail on
Components
- 0.23% fail on ABS
-
0.059% fail on
Parking brake
(78% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.039% fail on
Pedal
- 0.039% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.039% fail on
Pedal
- 0.020% fail on Additional braking devices
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
(35% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Front
-
0.57% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.55% fail on Pins / bushes
- 0.020% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Constant velocity joints (87% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Location
-
0.039% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.039% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.039% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(93% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Attachment
-
0.020% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(180% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Fuel and exhaust
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Fuel system
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.33% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Catalyst
-
0.43% fail on
Steering
(69% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Free play
- 0.020% fail on Steering rack
-
0.14% fail on
Power steering
- 0.059% fail on Other components
- 0.039% fail on Rams (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Operation
- 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Road wheels
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.059% fail on Attachment
-
0.35% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.059% fail on Requirements
- 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.18% fail on
Body and structure
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
- 0.078% fail on Drivers
- 0.059% fail on Passengers front
-
0.020% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.020% fail on Chassis
- 0.020% fail on Body condition
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
.jpg)
Chevrolet Matiz 2005
Cute looking and improved over original Daewoo Matiz. Packs four people into a tiny car.
