Volvo 940 MOT Results
Registered in 199255.9% pass rate
from 510 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo 940 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Position lamps
(57% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Front lamps (87% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.7% fail on Battery (96% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.39% fail on Tell tales
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Horn
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 1992 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(63% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (60% better than other 1992 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.20% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.20% fail on Switch
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Front wheels
- 2.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.39% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Gradient hand brake
-
2.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(50% better than other 1992 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Components
(52% better than other 1992 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.39% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Components
(52% better than other 1992 cars)
- 2.2% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.39% fail on Brake discs
- 0.20% fail on Brake back plates
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical components
(6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pivot
-
0.78% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.78% fail on
Pedal
- 0.59% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.78% fail on
Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
3.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.3% fail on Component mounting
- 0.20% fail on Subframe mounting
- 3.3% fail on Front suspension joints (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.59% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 0.20% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.59% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.20% fail on Front
- 0.20% fail on Rear
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Location
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.20% fail on Suspension unit
-
3.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (95% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.78% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.78% fail on Cap
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.1% fail on Wipers (68% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.59% fail on Windscreen
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
4.7% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.78% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Other components
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
-
3.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
0.78% fail on
Doors
- 0.59% fail on Passengers other
- 0.20% fail on Passengers front
- 0.39% fail on Speedometer
-
0.39% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.39% fail on Chassis
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(69% better than other 1992 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
(69% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (75% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Requirements
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
(69% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Towbars
- 0.20% fail on Towbar