Volvo 440 MOT Results
Registered in 199649.6% pass rate
from 123 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo 440 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
8.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.5% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front lamps
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Battery
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.3% fail on Individual lamps
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
-
0.81% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.81% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.81% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
8.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.5% fail on Component mounting
- 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.81% fail on Spring mounting
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.81% fail on Location
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
0.81% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.81% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.81% fail on Condition
-
0.81% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.81% fail on Condition
-
0.81% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.81% fail on Condition
-
0.81% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.81% fail on Front
- 0.81% fail on Front suspension joints
-
8.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.5% fail on Front wheels
- 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
7.3% fail on
Hub components
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
5.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.9% fail on
Components
- 4.1% fail on Hoses
- 2.4% fail on Pipes
- 1.6% fail on Leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Components
- 0.81% fail on ABS
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 6.5% fail on Emissions
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.81% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.81% fail on Pipe
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.1% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
-
9.8% fail on
Tyres
- 7.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
-
6.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pipes and hoses (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Operation
- 0.81% fail on Other components
-
1.6% fail on
Steering system
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
3.3% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate
-
2.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.81% fail on Speedometer
- 0.81% fail on Body condition
-
0.81% fail on
Doors
- 0.81% fail on Drivers
-
0.81% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.81% fail on Condition