Toyota Supra MOT Results

Registered in 1996
81.5% pass rate
from 200 tests in 2020
(53% better than other 1996 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Supra is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.50% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.50% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.50% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
  • 5.5% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.50% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.50% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 3.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Body
      • 0.50% fail on Panel
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.50% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 2.5% fail on Suspension (82% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Springs
      • 0.50% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.50% fail on Coil spring
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.50% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering wheel (16 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages