Toyota Lucida MOT Results

Registered in 1995
49.5% pass rate
from 275 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Lucida is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.36% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.73% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.73% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 8.4% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
      • 0.73% fail on Rear
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting (72% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.73% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Pipes
        • 3.3% fail on Hoses
        • 3.3% fail on Valves (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.36% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.73% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.73% fail on Operation
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal
        • 0.36% fail on Condition
        • 0.36% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.73% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage
      • 0.36% fail on Cable
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.5% fail on Emissions
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.36% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 2.2% fail on Steering
    • 0.73% fail on Steering control
      • 0.36% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.36% fail on Steering column
    • 0.73% fail on Steering system (81% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Rams
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
  • 2.2% fail on Road Wheels (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Requirements
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (74% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.73% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.36% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel

Search Good Garages