MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Lucida » 1994

Toyota Lucida MOT Results

Registered in 1994
53.5% pass rate
from 142 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Lucida is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.70% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Shock absorbers (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.70% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.70% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Load sensing valves (23 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.70% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal
    • 0.70% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.70% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Flexible couplings (44 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Pipe
    • 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.70% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.70% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.70% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.70% fail on Towbar
      • 0.70% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 9.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.2% fail on Compression ignition (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (14 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.70% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.70% fail on Power steering
      • 0.70% fail on Operation
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.70% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Requirements

Search Good Garages