Toyota Lucida MOT Results
Registered in 199456.0% pass rate
from 225 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Lucida is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(58% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 16% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Tell tale
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
9.8% fail on
Position lamps
(110% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.44% fail on Switch
- 4.4% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
9.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.4% fail on
Components
- 4.4% fail on Valves (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Pipes
- 2.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.44% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.44% fail on Operation
-
8.4% fail on
Components
-
8.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Front wheels
- 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Hub components
(170% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.44% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.89% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.89% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.44% fail on
Hand operated control valves
- 0.44% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.44% fail on
Components
- 0.44% fail on Valves
-
0.44% fail on
Components
-
9.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
8.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(73% better than other 1994 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Component mounting (74% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Subframe mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.89% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.44% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Rear
- 0.44% fail on Front suspension joints
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.6% fail on Emissions
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.89% fail on Cap
- 0.89% fail on System
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
(79% worse than other 1994 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Condition
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
-
3.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.1% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Passengers front
- 0.44% fail on Drivers
-
0.44% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.44% fail on Chassis
-
3.1% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
-
0.89% fail on
Steering system
(79% better than other 1994 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Steering rack
- 0.44% fail on Steering arm
-
0.89% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.44% fail on Other components
-
0.44% fail on
Steering control
- 0.44% fail on Steering column
- 0.44% fail on Locking devices
-
0.89% fail on
Steering system
(79% better than other 1994 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(73% better than other 1994 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.89% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.44% fail on
Towbars
- 0.44% fail on Towbar
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment