Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 1989
66.7% pass rate
from 51 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 2.0% fail on Lever
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Brake fluid
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 5.9% fail on Horn
      • 2.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 2.0% fail on Towbar
      • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Prop shaft
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on View to rear
      • 2.0% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (8 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.0% fail on Leaf spring
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 7.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.9% fail on Compression ignition (11 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (16 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.9% fail on Road Wheels (13 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1989 cars)
  • 2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages