Toyota Corolla Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2008
63.9% pass rate
from 1,382 tests in 2020
(15% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Corolla Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp (42% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.072% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.072% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.072% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.072% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.65% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.072% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.072% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.072% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.072% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (57% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Catalyst emissions (70% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.072% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.072% fail on Undertray
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Tank (25 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Pipe
      • 0.072% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.72% fail on Exhaust system (66% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Drive shafts (88% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition (18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Body
      • 0.072% fail on Other body component
    • 0.072% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.072% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.2% fail on Suspension (84% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (81% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.072% fail on Axles
      • 0.072% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.072% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.072% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Attachment
      • 0.072% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.36% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Power steering
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
  • 0.072% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.072% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages