Toyota Carina MOT Results

Registered in 1990
68.3% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2020
(1.6% worse than other 1990 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Carina is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (15% better than other 1990 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 11% fail on Brakes (1.6% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance (21% worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (0.80% worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (3.9% worse than other 1990 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% worse than other 1990 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 1990 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.6% fail on Hand lever
  • 11% fail on Suspension (8.5% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (60% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 7.9% fail on Steering (90% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility (22% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (7.4% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (16% better than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (8.5% better than other 1990 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (53% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested

Search Good Garages