Suzuki X-90 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
54.4% pass rate
from 68 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki X-90 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on All position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.5% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.5% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.5% fail on Brake fluid
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.4% fail on Chassis
      • 4.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 1.5% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Driver's seat
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (200% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Driver's view
    • 1.5% fail on View to rear
      • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 8.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 8.8% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages