Suzuki Jimny MOT Results
Registered in 199541.9% pass rate
from 31 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
6.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt
- 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt
-
6.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 6.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
26% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 9.7% fail on Headlamp
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
6.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.2% fail on Battery(ies)
- 3.2% fail on Horn
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
9.7% fail on
Headlamps
-
26% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
6.5% fail on
Fuel system
(9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (34 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.2% fail on
Transmission
-
3.2% fail on
Prop shafts
- 3.2% fail on Joints
-
3.2% fail on
Prop shafts
- 3.2% fail on Floor
-
3.2% fail on
Seats
- 3.2% fail on Passenger's seat
-
26% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
26% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
26% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 9.7% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions (27 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
26% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
26% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Wipers
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension
-
3.2% fail on
Springs
-
3.2% fail on
Leaf springs
- 3.2% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
3.2% fail on
Leaf springs
- 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.2% fail on
Springs
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts