Skoda Favorit MOT Results

Registered in 1994
36.6% pass rate
from 71 tests in 2017
(55% worse than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Skoda Favorit is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Suspension (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 21% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 17% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.9% fail on Drive shafts (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 4.2% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.8% fail on Location (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on General condition
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.4% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.6% fail on Components
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 1.4% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Restricted movement
  • 18% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 17% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 17% fail on Steering rack (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Locking devices
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Cap
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Size/type (14 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 9.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 7.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other
  • 7.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages