SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 1999

46.2% pass rate

from 26 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

31% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 15% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 12% fail on Brake performance
  - 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 7.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
  - 7.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 7.7% fail on Rbt
      - 7.7% fail on Service brake performance
  - 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 3.8% fail on Rbt
      - 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 7.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 3.8% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 3.8% fail on Brake pads
19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 7.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 7.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.8% fail on Flashing type
    - 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
19% fail on Suspension
- 7.7% fail on Macpherson strut (43 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 7.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 3.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.8% fail on Suspension arm
  - 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 3.8% fail on Sub-frames
  - 3.8% fail on Sub-frame
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
15% fail on Visibility
- 12% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 15% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 15% fail on Spark ignition
    - 15% fail on Catalyst emissions
12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 12% fail on Exhaust system
7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 7.7% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 3.8% fail on Condition
3.8% fail on Steering
- 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 3.8% fail on Track rod end
3.8% fail on Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth