SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 1999
53.1% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Tell tale (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.1% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 1.0% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.1% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 1.0% fail on Servos
        • 1.0% fail on Valves
      • 1.0% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.0% fail on ABS
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 2.0% fail on Rear
    • 3.1% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Radius arms
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Cap
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Size/type
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.1% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Passengers other
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 2.0% fail on Body security (33 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers
  • 8.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 8.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 6.1% fail on Steering system
      • 5.1% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages