SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 1999
40.0% pass rate
from 50 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 8.0% fail on Macpherson strut (29 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Pins and bushes (34 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 2.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 6.0% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Pins and bushes (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 26% fail on Body, chassis, structure (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 22% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission
      • 6.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.0% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 2.0% fail on Doors
      • 2.0% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 2.0% fail on Door condition
  • 24% fail on Visibility (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Washers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Valves
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages