Rover Maestro MOT Results

Registered in 1994
64.5% pass rate
from 62 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Maestro is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 8.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.6% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.6% fail on Servos
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Pipe
      • 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 1.6% fail on System
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition
    • 1.6% fail on Cabs
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.5% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (26 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 8.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Hazard warning (17 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Switch (17 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 6.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages