Rover CityRover MOT Results

Registered in 2003
38.0% pass rate
from 50 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover CityRover is unusually good or bad.

  • 44% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 16% fail on Rear fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Switch (145 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Tell tale
    • 16% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 12% fail on Stop lamp
    • 8.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
  • 36% fail on Suspension (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 8.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 6.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 6.0% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Trailing arms
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.0% fail on Brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.0% fail on Components
        • 8.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  • 20% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Size/type
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Emissions
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on System
  • 6.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 4.0% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Operation
      • 2.0% fail on Other components
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Seats
      • 2.0% fail on Passengers
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages