Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2003
51.3% pass rate
from 228 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Headlamp levelling device (22 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.88% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.88% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.88% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.88% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.88% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.44% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Front wheels
    • 3.5% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (79% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Components (85% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
    • 0.88% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.88% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.88% fail on Electronic parking brake (105 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.44% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.44% fail on Components
        • 0.44% fail on Servos
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Steering system (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.2% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rams
    • 1.3% fail on Steering control (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Steering lock (50 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.88% fail on Steering operation (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 6.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.44% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
  • 3.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (59% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 0.88% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on System
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 0.88% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.88% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Drivers
    • 0.88% fail on Doors
      • 0.88% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.44% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages