Proton Satria Neo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.9% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Satria Neo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Battery (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
  • 20% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.7% fail on Parking brake (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Condition (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Hub components
      • 5.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 1.4% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on General condition
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 8.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Fuel system (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on System (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pipe
      • 1.4% fail on Cap
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages