Proton Persona MOT Results

Registered in 1999
67.4% pass rate
from 89 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Persona is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Macpherson strut (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.1% fail on Boot lid
      • 1.1% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 2.2% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages