Nissan Qashqai+2 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.8% pass rate
from 2,079 tests in 2017
(38% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Qashqai+2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Battery
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 6.2% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Couplings (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.58% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear
    • 0.58% fail on Sub-frames (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonded suspension (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.048% fail on Component mounting
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Hub components (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.048% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.048% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.82% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.048% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Components
        • 0.24% fail on Hoses
        • 0.14% fail on Pipes
        • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.14% fail on Leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.53% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Anti-slip (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.048% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering system (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.048% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.048% fail on Requirements
  • 1.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Passengers front (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Drivers
      • 0.048% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.38% fail on Engine mountings (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Body condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.048% fail on Body security
  • 0.91% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions
  • 0.77% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.72% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Nissan Qashqai (2007 - 2014)
    Very comfortable front seats with good ride. Feels well built. Strong Renault sourced dCi diesels. Elevated driving position and good visibility.

    Search Good Garages