MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Patrol » 1994

Nissan Patrol MOT Results

Registered in 1994
74.2% pass rate
from 62 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Patrol is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.6% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.6% fail on Lever
    • 1.6% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.8% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (16 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Hose
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Towbar
      • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.6% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.7% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Springs (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 3.2% fail on Road Wheels (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.6% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages