Nissan Almera Tino MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.7% pass rate
from 1,122 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera Tino is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.089% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamps (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.98% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Battery
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Individual lamps (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.089% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.089% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.45% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Coil springs (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Front drive shafts (72% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.62% fail on Front
      • 0.27% fail on Rear
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Panhard rods (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (121 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.089% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.27% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Hub components (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.089% fail on Brake linings
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.9% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses
      • 0.27% fail on Leaks
    • 0.53% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.27% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.18% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Cable
    • 0.18% fail on ABS (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 10.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
    • 0.089% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.089% fail on Tank
      • 0.089% fail on Cap
      • 0.089% fail on System
  • 3.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering system
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pump (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Other components
    • 0.089% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.27% fail on Body condition
    • 0.089% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.089% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.089% fail on Chassis
    • 0.089% fail on Seats
      • 0.089% fail on Drivers
    • 0.089% fail on Load security
      • 0.089% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.62% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.62% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages