Nissan Almera Tino MOT Results
Registered in 200555.7% pass rate
from 1,122 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera Tino is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.9% fail on Front lamps
- 0.53% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.089% fail on All position lamps
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
(46% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.98% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.98% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.89% fail on Battery
-
0.45% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Individual lamps (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.089% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.089% fail on Tell tale
- 0.089% fail on Horn
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.45% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
(39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.98% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Front drive shafts
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Front drive shafts
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.62% fail on Front
- 0.27% fail on Rear
-
0.71% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.71% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Panhard rods
(36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (121 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels
- 0.27% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.2% fail on
Hub components
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.089% fail on Brake linings
-
3.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.9% fail on
Components
- 2.7% fail on Pipes
- 0.36% fail on Hoses
- 0.27% fail on Leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Components
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.53% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.27% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.18% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Cable
- 0.18% fail on ABS (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Electronic stability system
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
10.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.45% fail on Size/type
- 0.089% fail on Valve stem
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(39% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.089% fail on Tank
- 0.089% fail on Cap
- 0.089% fail on System
-
3.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
3.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Pump (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Other components
- 0.089% fail on Locking devices
-
2.3% fail on
Steering system
-
1.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.45% fail on
Doors
- 0.27% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Passengers front
- 0.27% fail on Body condition
- 0.089% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.089% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.089% fail on Chassis
-
0.089% fail on
Seats
- 0.089% fail on Drivers
-
0.089% fail on
Load security
- 0.089% fail on Bootlid
-
0.45% fail on
Doors
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.62% fail on Attachment