Nissan 350Z MOT Results

Registered in 2002
63.5% pass rate
from 178 tests in 2020
(24% better than other 2002 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 350Z is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.56% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.56% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.56% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.56% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.56% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.56% fail on Lever
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.56% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.56% fail on Undertray
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.56% fail on Sub-frame
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.56% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages