Nissan 300ZX MOT Results

Registered in 1992
65.1% pass rate
from 86 tests in 2020
(4.9% worse than other 1992 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 300ZX is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (43% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance (10% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (48% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (52% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Brake pads (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (8.7% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim (53% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (2.2% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (1.5% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (1.3% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (1.1% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment (1.9% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Electrical wiring (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility (44% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (43% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Washers (37% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Driver's view (23 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms (76% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (11% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (48% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Spark ignition (53% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (19% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Emission control equipment (17 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Catalytic converter (24 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (17% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system (4.5% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (40% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (42% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Panel
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (1.0% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear (37% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (50% worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (30% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts (31% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (66% worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages