Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1990
69.1% pass rate
from 81 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.2% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.4% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System
    • 1.2% fail on Floor
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (13 times worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (19 times worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Drag link end (9 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 1.2% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages