Mitsubishi GTO MOT Results

Registered in 1992
62.5% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi GTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
      • 2.8% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Prop shaft
        • 1.4% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Tank
  • 9.7% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 8.3% fail on Washers
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 4.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 1.4% fail on Linkages
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (98 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.8% fail on Road Wheels (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)

Search Good Garages