Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results
Registered in 199647.0% pass rate
from 198 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
29% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 16% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 16% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 14% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(81% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
11% fail on
Components
(99% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 10% fail on Pipes (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
-
11% fail on
Components
(99% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake calipers (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
29% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(40% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 16% fail on Component mounting (200% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.51% fail on Subframe mounting
-
9.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.51% fail on Attachment
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Rear
-
1.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.51% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
24% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(120% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 20% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
-
7.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tell tale
- 1.0% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
-
0.51% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.51% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.0% fail on Horn
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.51% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.51% fail on Switch
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.51% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.51% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.51% fail on Switch
-
7.1% fail on
Position lamps
-
9.1% fail on
Steering
(92% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint
-
0.51% fail on
Power steering
- 0.51% fail on Other components
- 0.51% fail on Locking devices
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
-
8.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
6.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
6.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
-
4.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate
-
1.0% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.0% fail on Attachment