Mitsubishi Challenger MOT Results

Registered in 1997
60.3% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Challenger is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.4% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Panel
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
  • 8.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 6.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages