MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Challenger » 1997

Mitsubishi Challenger MOT Results

Registered in 1997
56.4% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Challenger is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.7% fail on Horn (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 9.0% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.3% fail on Operation
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 5.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 5.1% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.6% fail on System (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.4% fail on Body condition
  • 6.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Requirements
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages