Mitsubishi Challenger MOT Results

Registered in 1996
50.5% pass rate
from 105 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Challenger is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Tell tale
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 0.95% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.8% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.95% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.95% fail on Attachment
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 12% fail on Components (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 12% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.95% fail on Leaks
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.7% fail on Hub components (200% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Brake pads (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.95% fail on ABS
    • 0.95% fail on Restricted movement
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (74% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.7% fail on Emissions
    • 4.8% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on System (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Tank
      • 0.95% fail on Pipe
      • 0.95% fail on Cap
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 6.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.95% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 9.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.95% fail on Requirements
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 9.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.9% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.95% fail on Other components
        • 0.95% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.9% fail on Locking devices (22 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 0.95% fail on Engine mountings
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.95% fail on Towbars
    • 0.95% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.95% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.95% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages