Mitsubishi Carisma MOT Results

Registered in 1996
47.1% pass rate
from 119 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Carisma is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.84% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.84% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Switch (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.84% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.84% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.84% fail on Individual lamps
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.84% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.4% fail on Components
        • 7.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.84% fail on Hoses
      • 0.84% fail on Leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.84% fail on Pedal
        • 0.84% fail on Anti-slip
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.7% fail on Component mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
      • 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.4% fail on Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.84% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.84% fail on Tank
    • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.84% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Steering
    • 6.7% fail on Steering system
      • 5.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.84% fail on Power steering
      • 0.84% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.84% fail on Washers
    • 0.84% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.84% fail on Body condition
    • 0.84% fail on Doors
      • 0.84% fail on Passengers other

Search Good Garages