Mazda 121 MOT Results
Registered in 199737.7% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2017
(37% worse than other 1997 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 121 is unusually good or bad.
-
33% fail on
Suspension
(73% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 12% fail on Component mounting
- 5.8% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Spring mounting (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 4.3% fail on Rear
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Front wheels
-
4.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.3% fail on
Components
- 2.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.4% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.4% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Components
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
-
14% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 14% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.2% fail on Wipers
- 7.2% fail on Washers
-
10% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 4.3% fail on Body condition
-
2.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.9% fail on Chassis
-
2.9% fail on
Doors
- 1.4% fail on Drivers
- 1.4% fail on Passengers other
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
- 1.4% fail on Passengers
-
1.4% fail on
Load security
- 1.4% fail on Tailgate
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.9% fail on Emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Tank
- 1.4% fail on Hose
-
1.4% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate