Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.1% pass rate
from 429 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.93% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Reversing lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Reversing lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Horn
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.47% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 11% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.23% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.70% fail on Decelerometer (81 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance (84 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic systems (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake fluid (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Servos
    • 0.93% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.93% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Drag link end (81 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Steering column
    • 0.23% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.23% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering box
  • 5.8% fail on Suspension (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.93% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel joints/housing
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Tank (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Hose
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 0.70% fail on Towbar (158 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.23% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.70% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Passenger's seat (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission
      • 0.47% fail on Prop shafts (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Hinge
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Hinge
    • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.93% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.70% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.23% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.23% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Tread depth (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.93% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.93% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.93% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages