Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
64.4% pass rate
from 477 tests in 2017
(21% better than other 2005 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.9% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Battery
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Components (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.21% fail on Servos
      • 0.84% fail on Leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.5% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Anti-slip (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear
      • 1.5% fail on Front
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.9% fail on Axles (55 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Swivel joints/housing (69 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on King pins (287 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Stub axle
    • 1.0% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Radius arms (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Location
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.42% fail on Panhard rods (86 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (172 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Spring mounting
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.2% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Steering system (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (27 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Steering box (200 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Free play
        • 0.42% fail on Steering box (317 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Intermediate drop arm (431 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Other components (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.21% fail on Steering component
    • 0.63% fail on Steering control (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering coupling (31 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Universal joint (32 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.42% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
  • 5.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on System (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Cap (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hose
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.63% fail on Doors
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.63% fail on Seats
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.42% fail on Body condition
    • 0.21% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.21% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Chassis
    • 0.21% fail on Body security
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages