Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results
Registered in 200461.3% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2004 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(26% better than other 2004 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps
- 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.21% fail on All position lamps
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.43% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.43% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.64% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Battery
- 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Horn
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Lamp
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(30% better than other 2004 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Wheel bearings
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Axles
(52 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Swivel joints/housing (106 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on King pins
-
1.3% fail on
Radius arms
(14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Suspension arms
(86% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.43% fail on
Panhard rods
(73 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (112 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(93% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.43% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Component mounting
-
0.21% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.21% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.21% fail on Universal joint
-
0.21% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.4% fail on
Components
- 6.2% fail on Pipes (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Hoses
- 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Leaks
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
6.4% fail on
Components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake performance
(61% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Front wheels
- 0.43% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs
- 1.7% fail on ABS
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.64% fail on
Pedal
- 0.43% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.64% fail on
Pedal
-
0.64% fail on
Prescribed areas
(42 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (68 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
-
7.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Steering
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
- 2.6% fail on Drag link end (34 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Other components
(50 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Steering pivot point (31 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Steering component (138 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Steering box (71 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Intermediate drop arm (256 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Steering arm
-
0.21% fail on
Free play
- 0.21% fail on Steering box
-
0.85% fail on
Steering control
(10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Steering coupling
(20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Flexible coupling
- 0.21% fail on Universal joint
- 0.21% fail on Steering lock
- 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.43% fail on
Steering coupling
(20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Steering operation
- 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Cap
- 0.21% fail on Tank
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
- 1.9% fail on Emissions
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
(64% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Passengers other
- 0.21% fail on Drivers
-
0.64% fail on
Seats
- 0.43% fail on Passengers
- 0.21% fail on Drivers
-
0.43% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.43% fail on Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Body condition
- 0.21% fail on Speedometer
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.21% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate
-
1.1% fail on
Towbars
(37 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (57 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment