Land Rover Defender 110 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
61.3% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2004 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 110 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.43% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Battery
    • 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Horn
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
  • 14% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Axles (52 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Swivel joints/housing (106 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on King pins
    • 1.3% fail on Radius arms (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.43% fail on Panhard rods (73 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (112 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.21% fail on Universal joint
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.4% fail on Components
        • 6.2% fail on Pipes (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Hoses
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.43% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.64% fail on Pedal
        • 0.43% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas (42 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (68 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 13% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.6% fail on Drag link end (34 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other components (50 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Steering pivot point (31 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Steering component (138 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Steering box (71 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Intermediate drop arm (256 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering box
    • 0.85% fail on Steering control (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Steering coupling (20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Flexible coupling
        • 0.21% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.21% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.43% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Cap
      • 0.21% fail on Tank
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 2004 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.64% fail on Seats
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis
    • 0.43% fail on Body condition
    • 0.21% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.21% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.1% fail on Towbars (37 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (57 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages